It seems like the euro crisis is
entering yet another phase. Negotiations on the bail-out of the Cypriot banking
sector seemed to initially go so smoothly. Cyprus appeared to be just another country
making use of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), and while Greece was
humiliated, no one saw Cyprus’ application for the European bail-out fund to be
particularly shameful. Operation Cyprus was part of a routine that had entered
the Council after years of bargaining. Perhaps that was where the problem can
be found. Europe’s policy-makers underestimated the Cypriot problem. The Greek
state has survived, the euro is still alive; Portugal, Ireland, Spain, Italy –
austerity has been harsh, unemployment has skyrocketed, and poverty is on the
rise, yet life somehow goes on. Taking out 6.5% of people’s savings from their
bank accounts? Well, the Greeks have been treated like crap as well, and parliament
still waved things through, right? I suppose technocracy has reached its limits
in Cyprus. Alex pointed out the irony of it all in her last post though. People
in Cyprus were enraged by the idea of anyone taking out money from anybody’s
bank account, whether they were affected or not. When the government suggested
not to touch anyone’s savings if they are below €100,000, people still got
angry. Sheep protecting wolves, and deer protecting hunters. I supported the
expropriation of savings above a certain threshold, because I believe that the
alternative, to introduce Greek-style austerity measures, is even worse.
However, to understand what is really going on here, one has to understand
whose interests are really being protected.
Germany and the EU: really the right target? |
I am certainly not a liberal, yet
I believe that in this case, a liberal response of non-intervention is the
right way to proceed. Europe ought to rid itself of the plague of investment
gambling. I regard the purpose of a bank to be to supply people with loans if
they want to build a house or start a business. I took a loan to finance my
studies in the UK and in the Netherlands. Banks also serve the purpose of
keeping my money safe for us. Rather than storing stacks of money under the bed,
I bring my money to a bank, expecting them to store it for me. When I do that I
do not expect to take a risk, on the contrary! I believe that whatever else
banks do is their problem. No one should have to pay for their greed for
profit. The Cypriot banking sector was way out of proportion, and parallels to
the Icelandic banking crisis in 2008 are numerous. An economy based on the
totally non-productive financial ‘industry’, can, in the long run, not succeed
(this also applies to Luxembourg, which seems to follow a similar business
model; money laundry is by no means a particularly Cypriot problem). If the
Cypriot banks face bankruptcy, then to hell with it, let them sink. Rather than
using our money to finance immoral business activities in the banking sector,
use the funds of the ESM to guarantee people’s savings for up to €100,000.
There is no need for private banks. So many people who studied with me now work
for the banking sector, which produces absolutely nothing, and which grows on
the soil of greed and selfishness. People should spend their creativity and
their energy on doing something useful. The Cypriot government should select
the bank with the most solid business model, and nationalise it. There is no
need for more than one bank in a country with 750,000 inhabitants, and that
bank’s total assets do not have to amount to €40bn (more than twice the total
GDP!). Let the banks go bankrupt! Rich people would lose their savings (which
were useless to the economy anyway, if they were lying dormant on a bank
account), shareholders would lose their shares. People need to realise that few
people will be affected by this, and that our economy, not just in Cyprus, but
in all of Europe, requires an ablution of the financial industry.
The affairs of the Cypriot state
must obviously be allowed to continue, and funds from ESM can be made available
for that. The main reason Cyprus got into trouble is the entanglement of the
Cypriot banking sector with the sovereign debt crisis in Greece, which was of
course itself partially caused by the financial crisis in 2008. Nevertheless,
while the Cypriot state may of course be criticised, I think that many of these
criticisms apply to the dominant members of the eurozone as well. Reforms are
necessary all over Europe especially in Luxembourg, not just in Cyprus.
I don’t think that this is what’s
going to happen of course. The new phase of the euro crisis is that the
bankruptcy a member has very much become an option, and I would not be
surprised if that’s what we’re going to see in the next couple of days. Just
remember that there would have been an alternative. Supporting further bank-bailouts
turns us into sheep protecting wolves.
Harald Köpping